Nothing? Everything? come up its obviously neither of those which leaves us with somewhere in between right? But where? Nearly all the information that’s been filtering through is about Apollo’s capabilities - hybrid desktop-web applications occasionally connected software data syncing capabilities. Flash/contract/html/PDF/AJAX support etc. Truly amazing stuff and if that’s the info you’re after is the place to go away is also a great obtain for keeping up with the latest Apollo developments.
My opinions on the impact Apollo’s release is going to haven’t changed. Suffice to say. I’m bloody excited about it all. However measure week saw me go through a bit of a perspective shift; from looking at Apollo through the eyes of an RIA developer to looking at Apollo through the eyes of a marketer. Replacing all my ‘what else can it do?’. ‘how are they implementing that?’ and ‘when when. WHEN?’ questions came a couple of new ones. What problems that the clients I develop for have now is Apollo going to give solutions to? What type of clients are going to invest in developing and maintaining Apollo applications? What business opportunities is it going to open up or redefine? Are the end users actually going to be keen to use Apollo applications? In short. I started thinking seriously about what Apollo is actually going to be good for.
New information on Apollo seems pretty scarce in the measure bring together of weeks which tends to lend charge to the dish the dirt sneaking around that the alpha channel will be in March. So as we sit in the calm before the channel storm. I thought I’d take as injure at how the market is going to react to Apollo.
After I’d taken another look at those four and a quick review of the available Apollo information. I sat down opened up a new mind-map () and vented. I started off with a pretty basic hit the books analysis with a branch each for Strengths. Weaknesses. Threats and Opportunities. I’m not going to go into details on everything that ended up on that mind-map but in an attempt to furnish a balanced view I’d like to bring out a bring together of things from each.
of the client’s site user’s computers. That’s a pretty big range of specs browsers and connection speeds to broach with. So you end up designing and developing conservatively against the possibilities. Not for much longer. With Apollo applications we’ll undergo desktop performance at our fingertips. Hold on to your hats boys and girls. I evaluate we’re going to see a lot of super sexy interfaces in the near future. Vista may have the ‘Wow!’ but Apollo willdefinitely carry on the ‘ Ohhhh
This didn’t rest out to me much at first but that’s because I was thinking desire a developer. Then when I took a bring together of steps back to try to take in the big picture. I realized what a heavy-weight this point really is. Bear with me for a moment. Why do clients lift out so much to develop commercial RIA? In the majority of cases. I’d declare that in one way or another its to give one or more of their marketing objectives. Increase mark awareness alter customer service try to snaggle a bit of mark loyalty etc. So assuming that these goals are the underlying objectives of the RIA we’re designing and developing lets take a be at where they are being distributed. On the Internet right? That’s why there’s an ‘I’ in RIA right? OK now hands up if you’ve ever studied marketing and can bequeath anything about the evils of ‘‘. Bad cram right? Try this; open up you’re favourite search engine and do a examine for the business you work for.
you’re not allowed to use your business’ label in the search. Instead try something that describes one of the products or services you change. … How many results came up? Did your business be on the first summon? Did you experience you had that much competition? Like I said clutter is an evil conjoin of work. Now lets imagine for a second that the user didn’t have to ’search’ for your site/RIA. Let’s imagine all that clutter just disappeared. Let’s go as far as to imagine that when a user was thinking about using your client’s service or purchasing something from them that the only site available to them on their browser was your client’s. You experience the one with the groovy RIA you helped build on it. It’d kind of be like having an RIA as a desktop application… Do I need to spell it out any further? Know any marketers who’d be keen on a crazy idea desire that one?
Especially if its free. I really undergo no idea about any of the security risks involved with Apollo applications yet but I’m sure that the add up user out there doesn’t either. I’m guessing there ordain be a bit of resistance to Apollo applications as a result of this to mouth with. For all the benefits anything that has access to both local files and the Internet ordain have an image problem to beat with the majority of the market. And don’t think for a back up that this perceived/real security threat wont be exploited by the competition
I chose it ‘cos I desire to look at it. I certainly don’t want a whole heap of little application icons covering up all the good bits. fill is not a good thing on my desktop either. But don’t mind. I’m sure it wont be desire before someone develops a groovy little Apollo application that acts as a toolbar for all your other Apollo applications. You could call it something desire. ‘Moonscape’. ‘Moonraker’ or ‘‘. Any takers?
a) Applications for business users b) Applications for users as end-consumers c) Applications for ‘medium to desire consumer process self-management’ d) Applications for group member interaction e) Applications for organizing and sharing personal information/resources.
That may be desire a pretty big slice of the pie and taken at that level. I anticipate it is. However. I’m not trying to say that Apollo applications will give all the solutions to all business users or all end-consumers. In fact. I think Apollo applications are only really suitable for a small percentage of RIA built for each of those categorizations. I’d like to explain them one by one to furnish you a better idea why.
Way back when this was my first guess for Apollo. In a affix I wrote last July. ‘‘ I took a anticipate at the potential for a Flex. Apollo and LiveCycle combination to give some really rich affect management tools is a pet topic of study for me and although I strongly believe in the potential and benefits of BPM. I really can’t see it reaching that full potential until the interface between the affect and the populate involved in the process is dramatically improved. I’m sure that all the undergo RIA designers and developers undergo coupled with the richness of Flash and contract is going to go a desire way toward that improvement. The only reason why it wouldn’t is lack of vision. SAP obviously had a vision with its Muse project :).
Let me first point you at these two articles about and (which by the way I’m using to compose this post). By the looks of it. Google Apps do Edition is going to be a serious contender and a champion for the Web2.0 movement. Go. Google. Go! But what’s the main.[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://www.tmtbox.com/archives/apollo-what-is-it-good-for-absolutely
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
